Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 5 guests, and 26 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
nicolekristen, Raj@402, paulbenf, Samora, mahesh kumar
1246 Registered Users
Recent Posts
Element Attribution
by ClanGowland. 18/08/17 08:42 AM
Incrementing parameter in scheduled request
by ClanGowland. 18/08/17 07:31 AM
Gross to Net Summary Report
by delboy. 17/08/17 01:48 PM
11i or R12.1.x to R12.2.x Upgrade
by CT. 08/08/17 08:23 AM
R11.1.3 BACS Running slowly post TYE 17
by PaulD. 07/08/17 01:14 PM
Employment Intermediaries Changes
by CT. 02/08/17 06:54 AM
Shared Parental Leave
by SBi. 25/07/17 07:59 AM
Payroll Purge
by PaulD. 21/07/17 02:12 PM
So...(the IR35 discussion thread)
by PaulD. 21/07/17 09:47 AM
Top Posters(30 Days)
CT 5
SBi 4
PaulD 4
delboy 2
DanC 1
Popular Topics(Views)
406,843 PAYE RTI
48,769 HR_PF.K RUP4
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
#5247 - 25/02/10 11:11 PM Re: Pay_Action_Parameters [Re: SBi]  
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 252
Gus Offline
claiming squatters rights
Gus  Offline
claiming squatters rights

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 252
Lapenne
Ok so the value is likley to be low then...will have to do some testing...will also have to se a vle for BEE that is above whatever cutoff figure we use was thinking of 10% of the rows in the batch

I can see the Action Parameter Group assigned to the Payroll Process as a parameter...good idea as can have different groups for different jobs

Last edited by Gus; 25/02/10 11:13 PM.
#5263 - 09/03/10 11:05 AM Re: Pay_Action_Parameters [Re: Gus]  
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1
John Akinyode Offline
passing stranger
John Akinyode  Offline
passing stranger

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1
United Kingdom
How do you locate the GFF file for the End of Year EDI process?

Thanks

#9076 - 21/02/13 01:12 PM Re: Pay_Action_Parameters [Re: Gus]  
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 79
Bagpuss Offline
hacker
Bagpuss  Offline
hacker

Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 79
Bath, England
In my quieter moments, I muse about the THREADS parameter.

Specifically, what is the optimal setting taking into account the number of CPUs, the number of cores those CPUs have and how many instances you have running on that server? The Oracle documentation that I've read is very vague in this regard. As a non-DBA, I'd like to ask how does CPU get allocated when you have more than one instance (e.g. multiple development environments) on one box?

#9078 - 21/02/13 03:06 PM Re: Pay_Action_Parameters [Re: Gus]  
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,074
CT Offline
CT  Offline

****

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,074
According to the Action Parameters white paper, the threads value should be less than or equal to the number of CPUs.

As another non-DBA, I have no idea how CPU gets allocated for multi instance on the same box. I imagine it will involve witch-craft, juju, rune stones, genuflexion with a bottle of Night Nurse, examining the entrails of a NAAFI pork pie etc.


CT
#9083 - 22/02/13 09:32 AM Re: Pay_Action_Parameters [Re: Gus]  
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 247
pat Offline
claiming squatters rights
pat  Offline
claiming squatters rights

Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 247
Hardy's Way
Our DBAs settled on 4 threads per CPU the optimum for our set-up. Any more seemed to cause page swapping and greater elapse times from the concurrent processes.

#9084 - 22/02/13 09:57 AM Re: Pay_Action_Parameters [Re: Gus]  
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 430
paulgos Offline
battle-hardened campaigner
paulgos  Offline
battle-hardened campaigner
****

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 430
Gosport
Hi Martin,

Seems overkill to me having that many letters. Seeing you are at the start of this project then suggest that they reduce the number of letters as this is high maintenance. They really only need to have a max of 3 letters like we have here and in each letter make a generic statement. Our third letter, which is for re-instating some one who has opted and and their conditions now make for them to be re enrolled, is very rarely meet. We don't generate letters for anyone postponed as government rules are EVERYONE is enrolled.

To make your life easier try and get them to reconsider the letters.

This is just a suggestion grin

Cheers


Paul

#9085 - 22/02/13 10:11 AM Re: Pay_Action_Parameters [Re: paulgos]  
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,074
CT Offline
CT  Offline

****

Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,074
Originally Posted by paulgos
Hi Martin,

Seems overkill to me having that many letters. Seeing you are at the start of this project then suggest that they reduce the number of letters as this is high maintenance. They really only need to have a max of 3 letters like we have here and in each letter make a generic statement. Our third letter, which is for re-instating some one who has opted and and their conditions now make for them to be re enrolled, is very rarely meet. We don't generate letters for anyone postponed as government rules are EVERYONE is enrolled.

To make your life easier try and get them to reconsider the letters.

This is just a suggestion grin

Cheers


Paul

Paul

Interesting though this is, you might want to consider posting this on the right thread...

This is just a suggestion

Cheers

Clive grin


CT
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  bcooper, CT 

Forum Statistics
Forums48
Topics2,178
Posts11,796
Members1,247
Most Online90
Mar 5th, 2017
Today's Birthdays
No Birthdays
Recent vacancies
Top Posters(All Time)
CT 2,074
bcooper 1,283
delboy 1,237
paulgos 430
SBi 416
Gus 252
pat 247
vkumar 223
August
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.049s Queries: 16 (0.014s) Memory: 2.7812 MB (Peak: 2.9595 MB) Zlib disabled. Server Time: 2017-08-19 13:13:38 UTC