|
1 registered (CT),
10
Guests and
4
Spiders online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
#5602 - 09/07/10 02:47 PM
Re: R12 Sandbox environment?
[Re: CT]
|
hacker
   
Registered: 08/03/07
Posts: 94
Loc: Manchester, UK
|
Hello Barry,
Good idea, but personally, as with the environment provided by Solution Beacon, the main problem I have with sandbox environments is that I often want to look at table definitions, and other back-end structures, and providing this access to your sandbox environment would, of course, be very dangerous.
If you have any idea as to a way to provide read-only access, but with the ability to utilise packages and functions, and the ability to populate FND_SESSIONS, I think this would be a VERY interesting alternative.
Sorry if I sound negative. I think your offer is very good, especially as the Solution Beacon instance is SO messy.
Regards,
Peter.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#5605 - 12/07/10 01:03 PM
Re: R12 Sandbox environment?
[Re: PeterP]
|
hacker
Registered: 14/03/05
Posts: 97
Loc: Manchester
|
Barry, as long as the policies for refreshing it every so often are in place it should work...good idea! Regards, Jairo
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#5606 - 12/07/10 02:44 PM
Re: R12 Sandbox environment?
[Re: PeterP]
|
Guru
   
Registered: 11/03/05
Posts: 1112
Loc: Earth, Europe, England, here
|
Hello Barry,
Good idea, but personally, as with the environment provided by Solution Beacon, the main problem I have with sandbox environments is that I often want to look at table definitions, and other back-end structures, and providing this access to your sandbox environment would, of course, be very dangerous.
If you have any idea as to a way to provide read-only access, but with the ability to utilise packages and functions, and the ability to populate FND_SESSIONS, I think this would be a VERY interesting alternative.
Sorry if I sound negative. I think your offer is very good, especially as the Solution Beacon instance is SO messy.
Regards,
Peter. Hi Peter. I agree entirely with your view - the Solution Beacon sandbox proved limiting in its usefulness due to the limitations. Strangely we have a similar situation where i am currently working, where we have a production copy system with named readonly accounts for access to the back-end. However enough priviliges have been opened up to enable function calls and maintenance of fnd_sessions etc. I think it was quite tricky to set up and maybe beyond what i can achieve. Regards Barry
_________________________
HCM Aces is for sale! Please contact me if you are interested. Also my random musings courtesy of Twitter
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#5607 - 12/07/10 02:48 PM
Re: R12 Sandbox environment?
[Re: jmoyano]
|
Guru
   
Registered: 11/03/05
Posts: 1112
Loc: Earth, Europe, England, here
|
Barry, as long as the policies for refreshing it every so often are in place it should work...good idea! Regards, Jairo Yes refresh policies would need to be established up front. I think the frst hurdle i have is not the set-up/configuration of the environment itself, but where it is hosted. I could self-host but fear that my weedy home broadband connection would crumble with only a couple of active connections. I am in conversation with my current hosting providers (the people who own the servers that host this and my other sites). Principal agreement is good, but again the questions come down to bandwidth allocations. I have a very generous monthly bandwidth allowance, but need to ensure that it is suitably distributed across my various hosted commitments. Talks and plans are on-going. Regards Barry
_________________________
HCM Aces is for sale! Please contact me if you are interested. Also my random musings courtesy of Twitter
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
791 Members
48 Forums
1584 Topics
7657 Posts
Max Online: 67 @ 14/04/12 05:38 PM
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|