|
1 registered (Chris Abraham),
2
Guests and
7
Spiders online. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
#7224 - 08/01/12 05:22 PM
Re: Teachers' pension issue
[Re: CT]
|
nothin' better to do
Registered: 16/03/05
Posts: 146
Loc: Lapenne
|
Do you mean the person is retiring...ie is a Pensioner
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#7226 - 09/01/12 08:10 AM
Re: Teachers' pension issue
[Re: delboy]
|
lurker
Registered: 09/01/12
Posts: 5
|
Hello
I'm the guy with the original question - Clive persuaded me to sign up!
Yes, currently (mostly for teachers although it can happen for other staff), our Payroll department requires us to terminate and employee record and start a new one. The most common occurrence in this is Flexible Retirements but it can also happen if a person changes payroll (eg from Fortnightly payroll to Monthly payroll).
Thanks
Martin
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#7233 - 09/01/12 11:54 AM
Re: Teachers' pension issue
[Re: CT]
|
Guru
 
Registered: 11/03/05
Posts: 1188
Loc: Bath
|
Martin, a warm welcome to the madness that is HCMAces Regarding (mid tax year) payroll changes, I think there would be a need to terminate/rehire in the case where the old/new payrolls are on different tax references. This question (and the answer) popped up in another thread a couple of years ago: http://www.hcmaces.com/forums/ubbthreads...Change#Post5698Still not 100% sure about what is meant by 'flexible retirement' though - is it a change to an employee's employment status, or is it as our Del Boy thinks, a (possibly temporary) cessation of pension contributions? If it's the latter, that wouldn't sound like a reason to terminate and rehire. Indeed, it could get a bit messy if people dip in and out as the fancy takes them!
_________________________
L&K CT
Remember: A dog is for life, not just for Christmas... unless you're in Korea
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#7241 - 09/01/12 03:40 PM
Re: Teachers' pension issue
[Re: CT]
|
nothin' better to do
Registered: 16/03/05
Posts: 146
Loc: Lapenne
|
This is the reason I was if they where a Pensioner. We have the same thing at the site I am on.
The only reason for re-creating an employee is if they change Payrolls and change Tax-refs which sounds like what is happening.
If you do not Term and rehire then you get TYE issues.
There was an issue a couple of years ago, at a major site
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#7245 - 10/01/12 09:34 AM
Re: Teachers' pension issue
[Re: CT]
|
lurker
Registered: 09/01/12
Posts: 5
|
Thanks for the replies. We have to do it if they change Payrolls, but also if a teacher changes their working hours. We also need to do it if they take Flexible Retirement (which effectively means they go onto new hours and have access to their Pension).
Thanks
Martin
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#7250 - 10/01/12 02:35 PM
Re: Teachers' pension issue
[Re: CT]
|
veteran
Registered: 15/03/05
Posts: 597
Loc: Somewhere in Berkshire
|
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#7251 - 10/01/12 02:38 PM
Re: Teachers' pension issue
[Re: CT]
|
newbie
Registered: 08/04/08
Posts: 13
Loc: Leicester
|
I’ve asked about this at my current site, and whilst changes of hours certainly wouldn’t require a new record, the flexible retirement issue is more difficult.
When a teacher retires mid month but wishes to come back on reduced terms, they need a break in service of 24 hours before they can be rehired again whilst also picking up their pension. This isn’t possible mid month as they need a final process date in place so have to be set up again under a new employee number.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
792 Members
48 Forums
1584 Topics
7663 Posts
Max Online: 67 @ 14/04/12 05:38 PM
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
|
|